MMI practice question: what would you do?

Practice question: Drop an answer, let's discuss:

A woman enters the emergency room with stomach pain. She undergoes a CT scan and is diagnosed with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. The physicians inform her that the only way to fix the problem is surgically, and that the chances of survival are about 50/50. They also inform her that time is of the essence, and that should the aneurysm burst, she would be dead in a few short minutes. The woman is an exotic dancer; she worries that the surgery will leave a scar that will negatively affect her work; therefore, she refuses any surgical treatment. Even after much pressuring from the physicians, she adamantly refuses surgery. Feeling that the woman is not in her correct state of mind and knowing that time is of the essence, the surgeons decide to perform the procedure without consent. They anesthetize her and surgically repair the aneurysm. She survives, and sues the hospital for millions of dollars. Do you believe that the physician's actions can be justified in any way? Is it ever right to take away someone's autonomy?

---
Personal question, not part of the MMI ***** Also, is it acceptable to give an answer where you evaluate the pros and cons of both sides of the argument? Do you need to pick a side? I know that as a doctor you have to make hard decisions and take responsibility for them, so I'm feeling like yes, you do need to choose one answer and stand by it. But in these interviews, can you weigh the options so they can see your thought process? *****

----
If people find this helpful, I will literally post one of these every day until my MMI on Dec 12. It's really helpful for me to see where other people are coming from with their decisions on these, so if you want to practice these with me, let's do it!